

Yesterday I even downloaded the Helix installer and When this abnormal even is happening, the network I cannot come up with any plausible idea for how the network could be Not sure what to day but I think there may be something going on Of ratio I typically see if a machine is giving the pinwheel and It was still very low compared to page ins and nothing like the kind Page count was higher than I have ever witnessed it on that machine Somehow over 7 gig of memory was used, nearly allĮven so, at this point Helix was fully responsive. At the time most of the memory was listed as inactive.Ĭouldn't see when sorting by real or virtual memory what application Don't have a clue why or what could have used However, when I looked at the memory there wereĪbout 3000 page outs.

Today, I looked at it before any complaints of slowdown. However, just in case I upped the RAM from 4 Originally, before the SSD, the afternoon slowdown was not as bad butīad enough to start this effort. This is a fascinating avenue that I need to explore somehow. Up, I suspect it's not the SSD (I hope not, since I just Right doctor, who finds it's something simple and fixes it! Don't give I suspect you're going to be like those people who spend years going toĭozens of doctors seeking relief from some ailment, without resultĭespite numerous tests and treatments.until they happen on just the Otherwise-correctly-calculated collection buffer setting? Issue previously discussed here-which shouldn't, but might, exceed your I can't help but think that someone else would be complaining aboutĪnother thought: could you have the external-document creeping-size Up all kinds of additional unpleasant possibilities. Unusual appears there? I'm guessing that your server is on a fixed IP,Īnd therefore directly accessible from the wide internet, which opens You investigated the console and system logs to see whether anything You by any chance run DiskWarrior (both repair options)? Is the

"afternoon delight" like this? I haven't. Profiler reports it identically to the HDD. The OWC drive isn't supposed to be affected in any case. I did read through a bunch of those things. I am nearly certain that when the slowdown hits itĪctually becomes slower than the HDD when it is in the slowdown phase. I think it even goes beyond theįact that it is so much faster than the HDD the afternoon slowdown is Precisely that the HDD had an afternoon slow down. Have you consulted with OWC tech support? I'm very > topic, although the OWC drive isn't supposed to have those
Beesmart helix server mac os#
> "ssd performance mac os x"? It does bring up some pointers on this > there's also discussion that it's not necessary. > is some discussion of being able to enable it under X.6.7, but > Profile, under the SSD, do you see a line for TRIM status? There > suggests some kind of caching problem with the SSD. > down, but less than SSD? If it doesn't slow down at all, it > release notes I cannot find any reference to how we might > collection, we had to enable that feature. > had the option to save and clear caches. > like this might somehow be related to the buffers. Simply quitting the server and starting it up again > Server is once again only grabbing about 30 percent of the > What I can confirm is that when they notice the bog down, Helix To unsubscribe, e-mail to switch to DIGEST mode, e-mail contact a human being at. You received this message because you are subscribed to the mailing list. Looking through the release notes I cannotįind any reference to how we might accomplish that in 6.x. IIRC, on this particular collection, we had Simply quitting the server and starting it up again fixes the Server is once again only grabbing about 30 percent of the processor. What I can confirm is that when they notice the bog down, Helix While the SSD is noticeably faster before the bog down, it is Here is where we do see a difference between the HDD and the SSD. Now we are back to the thing that kind of nudged us into theĭirection of the SSD in the first place. So I know that a preference file was somehow responsible for the changed this behavior so that the Server consistently Deleting all the QSA preferences and some of the system (FWIW Gib I NEVER complained about the server grabbing all theĢ. The slow performance of the server corresponded with low processor Related to the fact that the drive was an SSD. I was blaming the SSD for something that was not likely to be Just a followup in an attempt to get this thread back to performanceġ.
